Frank van Vugt <ftm(dot)van(dot)vugt(at)foxi(dot)nl> writes:
> In case someone is interested, a little bit of fiddling around with
> the script below seems to indicate that for different events, deferred
> triggers are always executed in the order they fired. For one and the
> same event, they will execute in the order in which they were
> initially defined.
"Order in which they were defined"? Hmm, I thought we had agreed long
since to trigger these things in alphabetical order. Something is wrong
here.
regards, tom lane