Re: Self-signed certificate instructions

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Self-signed certificate instructions
Date: 2017-04-17 20:27:30
Message-ID: 94dd8fa1-683a-366a-97dd-e52ad2860384@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/17/2017 02:19 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 11:17:14AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> On 04/15/2017 09:58 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> The instructions on how to create a self-signed certificate in s 18.9.3
>>> of the docs seem unduly cumbersome. AFAICT we could replace all the
>>> commands (except the chmod) with something like this:
>>>
>>> |openssl req -new-x509 -days 365-nodes \ -text -outserver.crt\
>>> -keyout server.key\ -subj "/C=XY/CN=yourdomain.name"|
>>>
>>> Is there any reason for sticking with the current instructions?
>>>
>> Argh. Darn Thunderbird. This should of course be:
>>
>>
>> openssl req -new-x509 -days 365-nodes \
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> I think you meant "-days 365 -nodes" here.

yes.

>
> I think the reason we have those cumbersome instructions is that there
> is no way to create a non-expireable certificate using simpler
> instructions.

You can make it for a very large number of days. 9999 should be plenty :-)

TBH very long lived keys are a bad idea. In fact, self-signed
certificates in any production or publicly visible instance are also a
bad idea.

>
> I would like to revisit these instructions, as well as document how to
> create intermediate certificates. I have scripts that do that.
>

OK.. Do you want to run with this?

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2017-04-17 20:40:28 Re: Self-signed certificate instructions
Previous Message Keith Fiske 2017-04-17 20:19:13 Passing values to a dynamic background worker