| From: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cleanup shadows variable warnings, round 1 |
| Date: | 2025-12-03 06:52:14 |
| Message-ID: | 94ECEF6E-681B-40DF-8F6B-4CABE4CDB96A@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Dec 3, 2025, at 14:42, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Patch v2-0001.
>
> src/backend/backup/basebackup_incremental.c:
> PrepareForIncrementalBackup:
>
> Instead of changing the var name from 'i' to 'u', you can fix this one
> by changing all the for loops to declare 'i' within the 'for ('.
> That way kills two birds with one stone: it removes the shadow warning
> and at the same time improves the scope of the loop variables.
>
>
> - int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < num_wal_ranges; ++i)
> + for (int i = 0; i < num_wal_ranges; ++i)
>
> - for (i = 0; i < num_wal_ranges; ++i)
> + for (int i = 0; i < num_wal_ranges; ++i)
>
> - unsigned i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < nblocks; ++i)
> + for (unsigned i = 0; i < nblocks; ++i)
Unfortunately that doesn’t work for my compiler (clang on MacOS), that’s why I renamed “I" to “u”.
By the way, Peter (S), thank you very much for reviewing.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jian he | 2025-12-03 07:38:56 | domain for WITHOUT OVERLAPS |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2025-12-03 06:42:33 | Re: Cleanup shadows variable warnings, round 1 |