Re: The flinfo->fn_extra question, from me this time.

From: Dent John <denty(at)qqdd(dot)eu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Subject: Re: The flinfo->fn_extra question, from me this time.
Date: 2020-01-28 08:58:51
Message-ID: 94ECCA1D-457B-4421-9ACE-BF1DDD754BCE@qqdd.eu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks Tom.

I’ll look at it. Probably won’t be able to until after the commitfest closes though.

d.

> On 28 Jan 2020, at 02:58, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Dent John <denty(at)QQdd(dot)eu> writes:
>> I’ve updated the patch, addressed the rescan issue, and restructured the tests.
>> [ pipeline-functionscan-v4.patch ]
>
> FWIW, this patch doesn't apply to HEAD anymore. The cfbot
> has failed to notice because it is still testing the v3 patch.
> Apparently the formatting of this email is weird enough that
> neither the archives nor the CF app notice the embedded patch.
>
> Please fix and repost.
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-01-28 09:06:16 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Previous Message Amit Langote 2020-01-28 08:52:27 Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table