| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Itai Zukerman <zukerman(at)math-hat(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Indices and time spans | 
| Date: | 2000-07-31 14:49:20 | 
| Message-ID: | 9449.965054960@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql | 
Itai Zukerman <zukerman(at)math-hat(dot)com> writes:
> I have this:
>       SELECT ...
>       FROM trade, entry
>       WHERE AGE( CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, posted ) <= '5 minutes'::TIMESPAN
>         AND trade.entryId = entry.entryId
> That is, fetch all trades executed in the last 5 minutes.
> This query seems to run pretty slowly when trade is filled.  Putting
> an index on trade ( posted ) doesn't seem to help any
No, it wouldn't, since the indexscan machinery can only deal with
WHERE clauses that look like "indexed_column relational_op constant".
You need to recast the clause as something like
WHERE posted >= (CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - '5 minutes'::TIMESPAN)
Then you still have the problem of persuading Postgres that it should
treat the right side of this as a constant and not something to
re-evaluate at each row.  In 7.0 and later it's possible to do that
with creative use of a user-defined function marked "iscachable"
(for details see the archives for the last time this question came up,
a few months back).  But the lowest-tech solution may be to calculate
the cutoff time on the application side, so you can just send it as a
constant to begin with.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jerome Raupach | 2000-07-31 15:43:56 | result in a variable? | 
| Previous Message | Itai Zukerman | 2000-07-31 13:44:18 | Indices and time spans |