Re: Proposed WAL changes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed WAL changes
Date: 2001-03-07 15:36:17
Message-ID: 9448.983979377@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Do I have to send SIGHUP after changing postgresql.conf ?

In general, yes. I think that for the (still vaporware) archdir option,
you might not need to: archdir will only be looked at by the checkpoint
subprocess, and I think that a newly spawned backend will reread
postgresql.conf anyway. Peter, is that correct?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Devera 2001-03-07 15:39:38 Re: WAL & SHM principles
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-07 15:34:07 Re: Re: Uh, this is *not* a 64-bit CRC ...