| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Madeleine Thompson <madeleineth(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #15307: Low numerical precision of (Co-) Variance |
| Date: | 2018-10-03 14:21:14 |
| Message-ID: | 9447.1538576474@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The next question is whether or not to back-patch this. Although this
> was reported as a bug, my inclination is to apply this to HEAD only,
> based on the lack of prior complaints. That also matches our decision
> for other similar patches, e.g., 7d9a4737c2.
+1 for no back-patch. Even though the new results are hopefully more
accurate, they're still different from before, and that might cause
issues for somebody if it happens in a stable branch.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Madeleine Thompson | 2018-10-03 14:58:26 | Re: BUG #15307: Low numerical precision of (Co-) Variance |
| Previous Message | David Harper | 2018-10-03 14:08:26 | Re: BUG #15418: pg_restore fails with [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: function XXXXX does not exist |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Madeleine Thompson | 2018-10-03 14:58:26 | Re: BUG #15307: Low numerical precision of (Co-) Variance |
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2018-10-03 13:04:45 | Re: BUG #15307: Low numerical precision of (Co-) Variance |