Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog
Date: 2012-04-26 18:05:23
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I agree adding rarely-used options to a tool doesn't make sense, but the
> question is what percentage of the git_changelog userbase am I?

50% I think.  The only thing that's really concerning me here is that
the reverse-sort option seems likely to be bug-inducing, and I really
don't grasp that it has real value.  But whatever.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2012-04-26 18:11:41
Subject: Re: xReader, double-effort
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-04-26 17:40:43
Subject: Re: Assertion failure in indxpath.c

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group