Re: [PATCH] Obsolete wording in PL/Perl comment

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org (Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?=)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Obsolete wording in PL/Perl comment
Date: 2016-03-14 18:46:26
Message-ID: 9426.1457981186@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org (Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?=) writes:
> The comment in hv_store_string() says that negative key length to
> hv_store() for UTF-8 is not documented, and mentions that 5.6 doesn't
> track UTF-8-ness of keys. However, the negative length convention has
> been documented since 5.16, and 5.6 is no longer supported. The
> attached patch updates the comment to reflect this.

Pushed, thanks.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-03-14 18:51:47 Re: Prepared Statement support for Parallel query
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-14 18:41:27 Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.