Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+
Date: 2019-07-03 15:49:30
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 2 Jul 2019, at 22:35, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Anyway I'm not objecting to the patch -- I agree that we're already not
>> testing translatability and that this patch shouldn't be forced to start
>> doing it.

> I forgot to add that to my previous email, the patch as it stands in v8 looks
> good to me. I’ve missed having this on many occasions.

OK, pushed.

For the record, I did verify that the translatability logic worked
by adding some bogus entries to psql/po/es.po and seeing that the
display changed to match.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Binguo Bao 2019-07-03 16:06:13 Re: Optimize partial TOAST decompression
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-07-03 15:42:49 Re: Increasing default value for effective_io_concurrency?