Re: refactoring basebackup.c (zstd workers)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Dipesh Pandit <dipesh(dot)pandit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevanladhe(dot)os(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c (zstd workers)
Date: 2022-03-28 20:38:47
Message-ID: 939442.1648499927@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 1:47 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Not sure if you should remove this null-check or add some other ones,
>> but I think you ought to do one or the other.

> As I hope is apparent, the first hunk of this patch is not for commit,
> and the second hunk is for commit.

Looks plausible to me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2022-03-28 20:53:29 Re: refactoring basebackup.c (zstd workers)
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-03-28 20:33:57 Re: [PATCH] Enable SSL library detection via PQsslAttribute