Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition
Date: 2019-10-02 16:31:15
Message-ID: 9394.1570033875@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> I'm going to leave the assertion out for now and put in a comment for
> future reference.

WFM. At this point it's clear it would be a separate piece of work
not something to slide into the bug-fix patch, anyway.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2019-10-02 16:50:13 Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2019-10-02 16:20:11 Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2019-10-02 16:50:13 Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition
Previous Message Joe Nelson 2019-10-02 16:22:33 Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays