Re: What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ?
Date: 2012-05-06 17:17:02
Message-ID: 9384.1336324622@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ?

Same as it's been for a long time: FOR UPDATE [ OF table_name ]
works fine.

> older docs claim that the syntax is supported, but gives an error
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/sql-declare.html

Old docs incorrectly said that it was FOR UPDATE [ OF column_name ]
but we have never implemented it that way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2012-05-06 20:55:54 Re: What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-05-06 14:23:44 Re: remove dead ports?