Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Kevin Flanagan <kevin-f(at)linkprior(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?
Date: 2010-03-05 09:37:25
Message-ID: 937d27e11003050137q327dd87jdf6a00a31025cde@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Craig Ringer
<craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:

> Why _not_ distribute gettext headers, though? Sources I can understand
> for size reasons, but the headers are small and fuss free, and you need
> the _right_ _versions_ to build against the Pg backend.

No reason, other than I didn't realise they were needed to build extension.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PG East Conference: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-03-05 09:39:09 Re: Explicit psqlrc
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2010-03-05 09:31:49 Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?