Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Kevin Flanagan <kevin-f(at)linkprior(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?
Date: 2010-03-05 08:36:24
Message-ID: 937d27e11003050036i26f670ffk5b62ded8b223da13@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Craig Ringer
<craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> Kevin Flanagan wrote:
>
>> the compiler
>> complained about various missing include files, starting with
>> ‘libintl.h’. Having read the post at
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2009-03/msg00332.php I
>> created an empty libint.h in an include dir
>
> NFI why Pg for win32 doesn't bundle a copy of the libintl it was built
> against. I should poke the EDB guys about it, actually.

We do include the library. We don't include the headers or source for
third party code though - that would be considered part of the build
environment, just the same as the Windows SDK.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PG East Conference: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2010-03-05 09:05:06 Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2010-03-05 04:02:16 Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?