Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0
Date: 2010-01-21 19:31:03
Message-ID: 937d27e11001211131p2193a723ob9178b1c54f0df72@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers

On 1/21/10, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Le 21/01/2010 11:57, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> I feel sorry for 8.5 now. It had such high hopes of becoming a proper
>>> version.
>>
>> Yeah, well - it'll be remembered. I still find occasional references
>> to PostgreSQL 7.5 in the pgAdmin code.
>>
>
> Just saw this. Should we change every 8.5 with 9.0 in pgAdmin's code?
> That's not a hard work, but it would probably be better to do that right
> now.
>

I quite enjoy finding those old references - it's a weird reminder of
history (and of course, it makes no difference to the operation of the
code) :-)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2010-01-21 19:38:56 Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous Message Guillaume Lelarge 2010-01-21 19:00:12 Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2010-01-21 19:38:56 Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-01-21 19:25:50 Re: quoting psql varible as identifier