| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network |
| Date: | 2010-01-08 16:33:07 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e11001080833p7fe58a54ub4e1c81f18b31b5a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:12 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
>> Hey Andrew
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> >
>> > Windows came late to the buildfarm. According to the CVS log, the buildfarm
>> > client was first checked in in Sept 2004, got initial Mingw support in Jan
>> > 2005 and MSVC support in March 2007, when we finally got some of the tools
>> > sorted out.
>>
>> Right - but the buildfarm isn't a feature being offered to end users.
>>
>
> Neither is this. These people are developers or DBAs after all.
I know I'm a little slower than normal this week as I've had some sort
of virus, but say what? I was kinda under the impression that
developers/DBAs are end users of PostgreSQL. They make up a
significant percentage of people that I know than install, configure
and use it.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-01-08 16:34:01 | Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-08 16:22:18 | Re: git help (was: Serializable Isolation without blocking) |