Re: Application name patch - v4

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4
Date: 2009-12-02 08:34:25
Message-ID: 937d27e10912020034oa0905c9r31051de5e5a7b707@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

>> If we patch the back branches like that, anyone who's annoyed by the
>> extra connection cycle just has to update to latest minor release
>> of their server to make it work more smoothly.  Comments?
>>
>>                        regards, tom lane
>
> Given that this can probably be considered an *extremely* safe patch
> :-), I say go for it. It'll certainly make for less error reports
> around something that's not an error.
>
> If the patch was in any way complex I'd object against it, but this
> clearly isn't...

Agreed.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2009-12-02 09:12:32 cannot compile CVS HEAD
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2009-12-02 08:16:00 Re: add more frame types in window functions (ROWS)