| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] CREATE TABLE LIKE and SERIAL |
| Date: | 2009-11-01 12:24:10 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10911010424k6771590ey3e22c2acb9a47aa4@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-general |
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Le vendredi 30 octobre 2009 à 23:48:45, Tom Lane a écrit :
>> Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> > How is pgAdmin determining the serial type in this case?
>>
>> Most likely it's looking for the pg_depend entry that shows the sequence
>> as being "owned by" the column. However, that's an oversimplification
>> of reality. I would imagine that pgAdmin will lie to you in exactly
>> the same cases that used to break pg_dump (notably, where someone has
>> manually adjusted either the default expression or the sequence...)
>>
>
> I've just read this. I wasn't aware of this. Should we suppress this behavior
> of pgAdmin?
Do you have a proposed fix? I suspect people won't want us to stop
showing columns as 'SERIAL' when they actually were created that way.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PGDay.EU 2009 Conference: http://2009.pgday.eu/start
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | mehmetsait vural | 2009-11-01 12:54:52 | postgresql with c# |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-11-01 12:18:03 | Re: import 2009/10/31 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Morgan Lloyd | 2009-11-01 13:03:33 | Re: Forms generator ? |
| Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2009-11-01 11:10:03 | Re: Postgres alpha testing docs and general test packs |