Re: Client application name

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Client application name
Date: 2009-10-13 20:18:45
Message-ID: 937d27e10910131318w4bed0740o32599005d4537c72@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> Oh, and apologies to Jaime who I just noticed had volunteered to work
>> on this :-(
>>
>
> never mind... i get blocked for the ugliness of the libpq api connect
> functions...
> and my first attempt to solve that was seriously broken...

Funny - I reverted my first attempt at that bit too.

> besides, as Robert mention, because of pooler connections using a GUC
> is more appropiate...

I'd like both options to be available to the programmer.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-10-13 21:08:20 Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2009-10-13 20:13:35 Re: Client application name