Re: Client application name

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Client application name
Date: 2009-10-13 15:13:09
Message-ID: 937d27e10910130813s3b15f83cjf0e4e8cc6e2a71d4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>
>> The attached patch is a first quick cut of the basic functionality to
>> do this. Currently, it makes the following changes:
>
> Couple of thoughts,
>
> - should we use argv[0] automatically in libpq unless overridden?

How can I get to it from libpq? I could use getprogname() if present.

> - should we reject funny chars such as \n? (hopefully \0 won't be a
> problem)

Is there any need? I can't see that it would do any harm other than
maybe messing up some query output - and the solution would be 'don't
do that then' :-)

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-10-13 15:20:18 Re: Client application name
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-10-13 15:11:29 Re: Client application name