From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Julius Tuskenis <julius(at)nsoft(dot)lt> |
Cc: | pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PgAdmin iii |
Date: | 2009-10-13 08:16:26 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10910130116o560cfe46sb11b03e503292036@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Julius Tuskenis <julius(at)nsoft(dot)lt> wrote:
> Hello, Dave
>
> If it is possible - you can change directory names. Lets say instead of
> having directory v1.0.1 you could have v1.00.01. Of course if other web
> pages have links of these directories - it is hardly an option....
> I think the newest version should be at the top or at the bottom of the
> list, because people are used to sort chronologically. Unless ordering is
> somehow fixed - the problem will stay till pgAdmin III v2.0.0 is
> released....
Hi Julius
I'd rather have the numbers match what's in the release.
The bottom line is that in 11 years we've had *one* report that
someone couldn't find the download on the page, and even that user
hasn't confirmed that this is the cause of his problem - I'm not going
to start potentially breaking links (or rewriting the postgresql.org
ftp browser code) on that basis.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-10-13 10:26:28 | Re: Function's access control list ambiguity |
Previous Message | Dmitry Samokhin | 2009-10-13 08:12:06 | Re: Owner and privileges on sequences |