Re: Porblem running on Windows 2003 server

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Massimiliano Ziccardi <massimiliano(dot)ziccardi(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Porblem running on Windows 2003 server
Date: 2009-09-24 13:01:14
Message-ID: 937d27e10909240601t23bd87aboc33e6b266cd0419a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Massimiliano Ziccardi
<massimiliano(dot)ziccardi(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>It was built on an
>>entirely different machine than any of the core postgresql binaries in
>>the release packages.
>
> Ok. I got it :-)
>
> However, the binaries I download from the postgres site didn't work without
> the microsoft patch indicated into that email : is this an expected
> behaviour?

Well they won't work without the runtimes installed, and I believe the
patch is just an update to the runtimes. So my guess is that it would
have worked with the standard version of the them, as originally
intended (as described at
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/v8.3.8/win32/).

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-24 15:16:06 Re: Postgresql 8.4.1 segfault, backtrace
Previous Message Massimiliano Ziccardi 2009-09-24 12:53:38 Re: Porblem running on Windows 2003 server