From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Vote on Windows installer links |
Date: | 2009-07-08 19:38:28 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10907081238y7c26e600w4c872b08b9f0b724@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera<alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>
>> You keep talking about our installer, but as I've pointed out, most of
>> the packages linked to from postgresql.org come from third party
>> websites, some of which are also commercial.
>>
>> I assume your desire is for *all* of those off-site links to be
>> removed, and that you aren't singling out EnterpriseDB?
>
> The only one I can see that is not the operating system vendor's own
> site is Devrim's pgsqlrpms.org, which I knew was a bad idea when I first
> saw it. And now I realize that it even redirects to a commandprompt.com
> site, which is even worse :-(
Vendor or not, they're still third party. The Ubuntu site for example,
has links to their store, and Canonical's support services.
If this isn't a case of Simon being vindictive towards his ex-employer
(which I would like to think it is not), surely this survey should
address all of those third party site equally, and not single out
EnterpriseDB?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-07-08 19:52:53 | Re: Vote on Windows installer links |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-07-08 19:28:23 | Re: Vote on Windows installer links |