Re: Vote on Windows installer links

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vote on Windows installer links
Date: 2009-07-08 19:38:28
Message-ID: 937d27e10907081238y7c26e600w4c872b08b9f0b724@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera<alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>
>> You keep talking about our installer, but as I've pointed out, most of
>> the packages linked to from postgresql.org come from third party
>> websites, some of which are also commercial.
>>
>> I assume your desire is for *all* of those off-site links to be
>> removed, and that you aren't singling out EnterpriseDB?
>
> The only one I can see that is not the operating system vendor's own
> site is Devrim's pgsqlrpms.org, which I knew was a bad idea when I first
> saw it.  And now I realize that it even redirects to a commandprompt.com
> site, which is even worse :-(

Vendor or not, they're still third party. The Ubuntu site for example,
has links to their store, and Canonical's support services.

If this isn't a case of Simon being vindictive towards his ex-employer
(which I would like to think it is not), surely this survey should
address all of those third party site equally, and not single out
EnterpriseDB?

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-07-08 19:52:53 Re: Vote on Windows installer links
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-07-08 19:28:23 Re: Vote on Windows installer links