Re: Sourceforge PG release

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge PG release
Date: 2009-07-05 15:05:49
Message-ID: 937d27e10907050805x6a89c677pa48bfad40469a526@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Err, the one this thread is about? (updating sf.net).

On 7/5/09, Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Which item Dave?
>
> GB.-
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Dave Page<dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> Thats what we already have essentially. We just had an issue with one
>> minor item which got overlooked.
>>
>> Fwiw, i think having an sf.net project is a *bad* idea anyway. It's
>> confusing for people who find that project and don't realise it's not
>> actually used for anything. It seems a strange thing to maintain
>> anyway - it's not exactly likely to attract new users.
>>
>>
>> On 7/5/09, Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Should we treat releases as projects, including pm's, taking care of
>>> checklists while mitigating risks?
>>>
>>> Note the "including a PM". One per release, tracking and delivering.
>>> Community driven, public reporting.
>>>
>>> I can help preparing a project template draft.
>>>
>>> Gb.
>>>
>>> 2009/7/5, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
>>>> Dave Page wrote:
>>>>> On 7/5/09, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>>>> > Robert Treat wrote:
>>>>> >> On Sunday 05 July 2009 06:22:42 Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
>>>>> >> > On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 11:32 +0300, Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
>>>>> >> > > > o Why do I not have release permissions for our
>>>>> >> > > > project?
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > You should
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Oops, I just saw that you were not granted permission for that.
>>>>> >> > Fixed.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> This means we can start blaming Bruce for releases not getting put
>>>>> >> up,
>>>>> >> right? :-D
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Perhaps. My big question is why we are doing this now, and not a few
>>>>> > days ago. Updating external download sites was supposed to be on
>>>>> > some
>>>>> > checklist so we didn't have to fix this days after the official
>>>>> > release.
>>>>> > Where is it listed?
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/84WebTasks
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. Here is the line that I am interested in:
>>>>
>>>> 7/1 19:00 6/30 15:00 Update Freshmeat etc. Jonathan
>>>> F.
>>>> Josh & Devrim
>>>>
>>>> OK, so why wasn't this done? And who is Jonathan F.? Can we please
>>>> spell out his full last name because if I don't know who he is, others
>>>> don't as well. And Marc should be listed as a backup on that item, I
>>>> think.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
>>>> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>>>>
>>>> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Enviado desde mi dispositivo móvil
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>
>

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2009-07-05 15:07:23 Re: Sourceforge PG release
Previous Message Guido Barosio 2009-07-05 14:36:45 Re: Sourceforge PG release