| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16 |
| Date: | 2009-06-16 14:59:02 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10906160759y7df45469w36187fdf98824b96@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Not having looked at the script (though I expect it's in svn, even
> though the activity mail has been broken for a long time there *cough*),
> would it be possible to have it only send it if there are things
> overdue? I realize there's a bunch of things overdue now, but in theory
> it could be a comment added 5 minutes before the script ran - with
> nobody having a chance to send it.
That should be easy to check for news, comments and events. What do
you define as 'overdue'? 2 days? 3?
Other record types don't have submission timestamps at the moment.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-16 15:04:25 | Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16 |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-06-16 14:48:56 | Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16 |