From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-9 |
Date: | 2009-06-09 15:39:04 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10906090839u2361d5c0lcd50c898039abc8b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jaime
Casanova<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:04 AM, <webmaster(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> PostgreSQL.org moderation report - 2009-6-9 15:4:38.
>>
>> There are 1 professional service(s) requiring moderation.
>>
>
> this one is from "Pendulo Software", i was seeing it earlier but the
> page doesn't mention PostgreSQL at all, not even when it talks about
> database service...
>
> maybe we could reject this one and send a mail to the manager email
> saying what the reason was?
Yes, that's the normal course of action. FYI, this sort of discussion
normally takes place on the slaves list, but I'm aware you're not on
that yet.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-06-09 15:45:17 | Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-9 |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-06-09 15:32:38 | Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-9 |