Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-9

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-9
Date: 2009-06-09 15:39:04
Message-ID: 937d27e10906090839u2361d5c0lcd50c898039abc8b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jaime
Casanova<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:04 AM, <webmaster(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> PostgreSQL.org moderation report - 2009-6-9 15:4:38.
>>
>> There are 1 professional service(s) requiring moderation.
>>
>
> this one is from "Pendulo Software", i was seeing it earlier but the
> page doesn't mention PostgreSQL at all, not even when it talks about
> database service...
>
> maybe we could reject this one and send a mail to the manager email
> saying what the reason was?

Yes, that's the normal course of action. FYI, this sort of discussion
normally takes place on the slaves list, but I'm aware you're not on
that yet.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2009-06-09 15:45:17 Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-9
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2009-06-09 15:32:38 Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-9