| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feedback from recent training |
| Date: | 2009-04-26 19:03:50 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10904261203n6e85a25dh3afadee849ae5068@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 17:45 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> > Alphabetic seems best, whatever kind of type they are.
>>
>> No, because that mixes in the array types which we know causes
>> confusion for some users. We need to alphabetise them with the
>> non-array types, but thats likely to be messy.
>
> How about an extra radio button for Array/Non-Array? That removes the
> confusion.
I assume you mean a checkbox? We could have a global option to include
array types, defaulting to off. Few-enough people probably use array
types that overall it would make the experience nicer.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-04-26 19:54:37 | Re: Feedback from recent training |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2009-04-26 19:02:06 | Re: Feedback from recent training |