Re: Patch for pgScript

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Mickael Deloison <mdeloison(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for pgScript
Date: 2009-01-21 13:38:04
Message-ID: 937d27e10901210538i5151397ayffc25eccdfb7a7c7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Sorry for the delay in reviewing.
>
> Does using "[PGSWARNG]" really make sense? It saves only *two*
> characters over the much more readanle "[PGSWARNING]"

Urgh. Definitely less readable.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2009-01-21 13:44:38 Re: Patch for pgScript
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-01-21 12:39:38 Re: Patch for pgScript