| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
| Cc: | pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: New assignmet? |
| Date: | 2008-12-01 14:44:44 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10812010644g49bcedf2rc65f67fd269d61d1@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
> Date: Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:29 PM
> Subject: [RRR] New assignmet?
> To: pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
>
> Hi,
>
> i've been idle for a while... but this is what i did...
>
> - the patch for solve a problem of lc_time in windows is being under
> discussion now...
Yup.
> - i try to test the hot standby patch on windows but i get lost on
> what is the last version
> and what is the relation with infrastucture changes for recovery...
Yeah, I'm little confused on that one too. I think we need to wait for
Heikki/Tom to get the latter patch and it's friends committed before
concentrating on hot standby.
What about block level CRC? The discussion on that has tailed off now.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-12-02 18:58:54 | Alex --> pg_stat_statements |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-12-01 14:32:24 | Fwd: New assignmet? |