Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie <melanie(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]
Date: 2008-10-29 08:53:37
Message-ID: 937d27e10810290153l40bb3d2fo4756826e182dc81c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Robert Treat
<xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:

> +1 for kicking you guys off. I've always thought this arrangement would lead
> to confusion, and I doubt this will be the only time. The distinctions Alvaro
> laid out are clear, and I think we should go with them.

How exactly is it confusing? What's more confusing is that we have
some 'regional' groups that claim to be language specific (eg. French)
and some that are geographically based (eg. Italy). We use a different
naming convention for the PG.EU and PG.US lists for exactly that
reason.

In any case, the extent to which you'd be 'kicking anyone off' would
simply be to change the domain name - all the services for both
domains are managed by the same team on the same infrastructure
anyway.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie 2008-10-29 12:43:05 Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-10-29 06:47:59 Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]