Re: proposal to add people.postgresql.org as a CNAME for planet.postgresql.org

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: proposal to add people.postgresql.org as a CNAME for planet.postgresql.org
Date: 2008-10-28 16:27:01
Message-ID: 937d27e10810280927j4f023324of1a1b234946bbcf4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 08:21:20AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Except that "people" was generally a blogging service, which planet is not.
>> Wouldn't that cause confusion?
>
> And break the DNS entry for people when (if?) it gets restored?

Different domain. We're talking about [people|planet].postgresql.org,
not [people|www].planetpostgresql.org.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-10-28 17:17:28 Re: Bad link for win32/latest
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-10-28 16:18:06 Re: request blog aggregate