| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SQL/CLI |
| Date: | 2008-10-20 12:25:37 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10810200525m146c7350ve5dec9d7d7572a03@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Jonah H. Harris
<jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> Does anyone know how closely related the ODBC standard is to SQL/CLI? And do
>> we know how closely our driver conforms to either of them?
>
> ODBC is a superset of SQL/CLI. Though, the last time I checked,
> SQL/CLI was equivalent to ODBC 2.0. The current version of ODBC is
> 3.52.
>
> I believe Command Prompt's ODBCng driver is closer to the 3.0/3.5
> spec, though it isn't very friendly licensed (GPL).
Really? I know they are/were working towards compliance, but then
psqlODBC has been for a lot longer. I haven't really been tracking the
progress of either in the last couple of years though.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrei Kovalevski | 2008-10-20 14:14:35 | Re: [ODBC] Error in Adding All Table |
| Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2008-10-20 11:47:13 | Re: SQL/CLI |