Re: Finding some bug statistics..

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Chander Ganesan" <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Finding some bug statistics..
Date: 2008-09-30 15:16:07
Message-ID: 937d27e10809300816o44022bb5p7de74dee5a08e52a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> We don't have a bug tracker, thus there is nothing to gather statistics
>> from. We have a web form that is really just a sequence in a database
>> that generates a bug id, and then remails the whole form to pgsql-bugs.
>>
>> For discussions of why we don't have one, see about a billion mails in
>> the archives over the past 10 years or so :-(
>>
>
> The general policy is a 72 hour bug fix, right?

There is no general policy that I'm aware of.

> Do we have any
> ideas/numbers as to the currently "open" number of bugs (identified but not
> fixed yet)? That would be just as useful in some regard.

Nope.

> Also, is the sequence only a sequence, or is some of the data held in the
> database (queryable?) At the very least, I could probably get an idea of
> the bug submit rate by looking at the first bug of each month in the bugs
> archive (or are many of the "bugs" really SPAM)?

It's literally just a sequence. And the messages do get moderated, so
some numbers will be lost as spam.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-09-30 15:18:25 Re: Finding some bug statistics..
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-09-30 15:14:22 Re: broken links (intermittent)