Re: Bad link for win32/latest

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bad link for win32/latest
Date: 2008-09-24 07:33:48
Message-ID: 937d27e10809240033o7c1723d6m1e4beb423399e2ac@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
>> On Tuesday 23 September 2008 14:08:58 Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/latest, which should point to
>>> 8.3.4, is still pointing to 8.3.3.
>>>
>>
>> Actually the whole main directory needs to be updated, it isn't listing 8.3.4
>> or 8.2.10... http://wwwmaster.postgresql.org/ftp/
>
> I've updated svr1, I *think* that's the master and it should push out
> soon :-)
>
> I can never remember, on what schedule do we remove old versions? Did we
> say "keep current and one older"? In that case, there is some removing
> to do as well... In binary, for example, we have 8.2.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and
> 10 ATM - that just seems like a waste of space to me. For source, we
> have 8.2.7, 9 and 10, and in the 8.3 series 8.3.1, 3 and 4. We also have
> source/OLD which has 8.3.0, 8.2.5 and 8.2.6. All in all, seems we're not
> very consistent :-(
>
> If we don't have a policy, let's make one - get your arguments out :-)

Marc was managing that (and the symlinks) iirc. I'm not sure what
rules he was working to.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2008-09-24 14:02:36 Re: Binaries vs Source
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-09-24 05:46:02 Re: Bad link for win32/latest