Re: Additional psql requirements

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Additional psql requirements
Date: 2008-07-25 08:31:09
Message-ID: 937d27e10807250131l1dab0786q2786c5d1ac7b6506@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:52 AM, daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net> wrote:

> It seems to me that a sql-like client side scripting language should be as
> similar as possible to plpgsql. Pgscript looks a bit like plpgsql, but is
> pretty much incompatible with it for no particularly obvious reason.

pgScript originally used a c-like syntax when it was pgUnitTest iirc.
The new version is designed to be familiar to users of T-SQL.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2008-07-25 08:36:53 Re: Additional psql requirements
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-07-25 08:09:28 Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10