From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: CommitFest rules |
Date: | 2008-07-06 10:48:39 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10807060348k79f6678fx5fb5eee5d77bab6b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
>> Hmm, looks like some of the things I was thinking about have been added
>> recenelt... cool. One question I have still remains though, on the main
>> developer page (http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Development_information) it
>> has a link to the "current commitfest", which points to september's
>> commitfest page. ISTM the current commitfest is July's, since that's the one
>> we're currently working on.
>
> The meaning of "current commitfest" as used on that page is "the place
> you should submit a new patch today". I agree there's a terminological
> problem here, and we need to somehow distinguish that meaning from "the
> commitfest we are currently trying to close out". But you are not
> helping matters by trying to eliminate the distinction.
Agreed - but Robert does have a point - I know both Greg & I have
resorted to searching to find the in-progress fest page. I'll see if I
can improve the index page a little.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2008-07-06 12:58:38 | Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others |
Previous Message | H.Harada | 2008-07-06 10:15:02 | Re: introduction of WIP window function patch |