| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Justin Clift" <justin(at)salasaga(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Jonathan Bond-Caron" <jbondc(at)gmail(dot)com>, "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: New MS patent: sounds like PG db rules |
| Date: | 2008-05-27 13:18:31 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10805270618u5424d9e0ta1ab092ca348eb3d@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
HI Justin
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Justin Clift <justin(at)salasaga(dot)org> wrote:
> I'm trying to point out that - PG is a database system - and MS may have
> just been granted a patent for a fundamental part of it.
>
> Thinking it might need looking in to, and trying to bring it to the
> attention of some that can (or even cares?). ;>
I don't think it's a major issue. Even if MS do think we infringe on
the patent it would be laughable for them to try to do anything about
it given that our rules implementation has provably existed in a
leading FOSS project for a decade or more.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A B | 2008-05-27 13:24:38 | Annoying messages when copy sql code to psql terminal |
| Previous Message | Miklosi Attila | 2008-05-27 13:08:14 | active queries |