| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mickael Deloison" <mdeloison(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: License question |
| Date: | 2008-04-25 08:59:29 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10804250159w7755d8cfvb8a2896862331c94@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Mickael Deloison <mdeloison(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The Artistic License only seems fine and simple, so I am going to go for it.
> About psql integration, I have never thought about it. But pgScript is
> written in C++ (with objects and RTTI) and I think if its features
> were integrated into psql, it would be done in a different way, so
> this is not an issue right now.
OK, cool - Artistic only is most certainly the cleanest and most
agreeable approach imho.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-04-25 09:49:22 | Re: Broken 1.8.2 source tar ball? |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-04-25 08:58:06 | Re: Broken 1.8.2 source tar ball? |