From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Popular pages on techdocs |
Date: | 2008-03-17 08:49:15 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10803170149u1820920s4efc01b5fa03a5bf@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > You might be able to extract some useful data from Google Analytics if
> > you're willing to give it a go?
>
> I certainly was. Ignoring the main navigation pages, here are the most
> popular pages on techdocs:
>
alter table
change password
sequence
psql
...
>
> I had been working on a more task-oriented FAQ for postgresqldocs.org,
> staring at this data makes me think that would be nice to integrate with a
> "Popular manual sections" page of some sort. I sometimes guess what
> people want but it's always nice when it can be measured like the above
> instead.
Agreed.
Magnus, do you think it would be worth adding this data as an
additional weighting on the search engine to favour appropriate pages?
Or perhaps we should just update the docbot thingy.
> > I am aware that some of the text we migrated is *really* old now, so a
> > culling/archiving session would be a worthwhile pursuit.
>
> While there are some recent articles like my MySQL comparision, many of
> the most popular pages were dated 2001. There's plenty to be culled, but
> some it should be probably be refreshed instead.
You sound like you're volunteering :-p
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-03-18 20:00:37 | Why do we have two mailing list, lists? |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-03-17 08:46:31 | Reworking the wiki structure |