Re: MS library files

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Josue Gomes" <josue(dot)gomes(dot)honeypot(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MS library files
Date: 2008-02-19 13:41:34
Message-ID: 937d27e10802190541v1138750bv5e91b948913c5d24@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Feb 19, 2008 1:16 PM, Josue Gomes <josue(dot)gomes(dot)honeypot(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just wondering why lib\ms\*.lib files are not part of
> binaries-no-installer distribution.
> Is there any specific reason they're not included there?

Everything is Microsoft-compiled now, so no need for special versions
of the import libraries any more.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Oracle-compatible database company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message fdu.xiaojf@gmail.com 2008-02-19 13:46:04 Re: questions about very large table and partitioning
Previous Message User Scrappy 2008-02-19 13:20:05 Re: greylisting no longer working?