Re: [HACKERS] Patch review

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers list" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch review
Date: 2008-02-13 15:32:00
Message-ID: 937d27e10802130732s65ff0f74id388b49212daa4c8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Feb 13, 2008 3:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Perhaps it's because it was split in two by a monthly boundary? (I
> > didn't look.)
>
> Most likely. Somebody on the www team really ought to make an effort
> to fix that sometime --- it reduces the value of the archives noticeably
> if you can't rely on the thread links.

The current system makes that pretty much unfixable. I have spent time
on a PG backed replacement which does solve that and other problems
but unfortunately I just haven't had time for it in a few months. If
someone with PHP skillz wants to pick it up please let me know.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Oracle-compatible database company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-02-13 17:25:22 Re: Patch review
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-02-13 15:27:35 Re: [HACKERS] Patch review

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-02-13 17:25:22 Re: Patch review
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-02-13 15:27:35 Re: [HACKERS] Patch review