Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Hans-Juergen Schoenig" <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, cert(at)lists(dot)postgresqlcertification(dot)org, greg(at)tcscs(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification
Date: 2008-02-04 15:32:03
Message-ID: 937d27e10802040732p4f47b0abr77ec0fb37335a25a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

On Feb 4, 2008 3:20 PM, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> how can we determine which companies are certified from the beginning?
> i think it makes no sense to push redhat, for instance, through a
> certification process as they have tom and some others :).

I'm not sure if they actually do have any others, but having Tom
certainly doesn't mean that RedHats' support staff (who may have no
idea who Tom is) have any clue about what they are doing.

/D

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Santiago Zarate 2008-02-04 15:36:59 Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification
Previous Message Hans-Juergen Schoenig 2008-02-04 15:20:23 Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerry LeVan 2008-02-04 15:35:37 Universal libpq.a ?
Previous Message Tom Hart 2008-02-04 15:31:04 Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?