Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Tino Wildenhain" <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
Cc: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage
Date: 2008-01-16 16:38:26
Message-ID: 937d27e10801160838i3d8faa0fg4b985a4b75ccaec0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 16/01/2008, Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> wrote:
> Personally I'd prefer them to be rejected inband so the legitimate
> sender learns about the problem and reformulate the message accordingly.

The problem with that is that for 1 legitimate message, there's a
dozen or more from harvested addresses, the real owners of which won't
have a clue what the bounce message is about.

/D

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-16 16:42:43 Re: [CORE] Egad, what a lot of spammage
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-16 16:27:25 Re: [CORE] Egad, what a lot of spammage