Re: Name column

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: André Fernandes <andre(dot)de(dot)camargo(dot)fernandes(at)hotmail(dot)com>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, arhipov(at)dc(dot)baikal(dot)ru, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Name column
Date: 2010-09-24 16:16:09
Message-ID: 9376.1285344969@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I dislike this feature too. It is breaking other ANSI SQL feature -
> constructors, because it has same syntax tablename(field1, field2,
> ....).

Uh, that's nonsense. What we're talking about is tablename.functionname.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-09-24 16:16:57 Re: Name column
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-24 16:10:54 Re: Name column