Re: [patch] pg_copy - a command for reliable WAL archiving

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] pg_copy - a command for reliable WAL archiving
Date: 2014-08-20 14:19:33
Message-ID: 9368.1408544373@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2014-08-20 09:50:56 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Andres Freund wrote:
>>> Isn't this a solution looking for a problem? We're using tempfiles in
>>> dozens of other places and I really don't see why this is the place to
>>> stop doing so. Just copy to <dest>.tmp and move it into place.

>> The issue is what happens if there's a crash while the temp file is in
>> the middle of being filled.

> The archive command will be be run again a couple seconds and remove the
> half-filled temp file.

Alternatively, you could use the process PID as part of the temp file
name; which is probably a good idea anyway.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-08-20 14:27:46 Re: [patch] pg_copy - a command for reliable WAL archiving
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-08-20 14:19:00 Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces