Re: An idle thought

From: Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: An idle thought
Date: 2010-03-18 08:59:23
Message-ID: 9362e74e1003180159h747df7d1j27cfb95acf8a6bba@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> > There are all kinds of challenges there, but it might be worth thinking
> > about. Visibility information is highly compressible, and requires
> > constant maintenance (updates, deletes, freezing, etc.). It also might
> > make it possible to move to 64-bit xids, if we wanted to.
>
> If you want it to be cheaply updatable (or even cheaply readable),
> compression is not what you're going to do.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> +1..

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-03-18 09:19:21 Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints
Previous Message Pavel Golub 2010-03-18 08:07:06 Re: PQftype implementation