Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables

From: Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Karl Schnaitter <karlsch(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Date: 2010-02-26 04:20:21
Message-ID: 9362e74e1002252020j1917d6fl95dbd12b82a02a8f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
>>
> First of all, volatility is not the only issue. The ordering ops could also
> be incorrect, e.g., violate the transitivity property. there is no reliable
> way to determine if a function is volatile and/or incorrectly specified.
>

No it is the only issue. If you create a datatype with volatile function for
ordering ops, then you have the broken data type(the one you are referring
to). So they are one and the same.

Thanks,
Gokul.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gokulakannan Somasundaram 2010-02-26 04:24:08 Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2010-02-26 04:19:47 Re: visibility maps and heap_prune