| From: | "Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Index Page Split logging |
| Date: | 2008-01-02 09:19:35 |
| Message-ID: | 9362e74e0801020119i6483c3b1x1a28cea5628490d5@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jan 2, 2008 2:25 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 14:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > > If we could log *only* the insert that caused the split, rather than
> the
> > > split itself, we would avoid that situation entirely.
> >
> > How are you going to avoid the need to run user-defined functions
> > (specifically, the btree comparison functions) during replay?
>
> Seems like a good objection. Just exercising my lateral thought muscles.
>
Can this be explained in more detail???
Thanks,
Gokul.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2008-01-02 10:05:11 | Re: Index Page Split logging |
| Previous Message | Andrew Chernow | 2008-01-02 01:49:53 | Re: binary array and record recv |