Re: Safeguards against incorrect fd flags for fsync()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Safeguards against incorrect fd flags for fsync()
Date: 2025-06-24 14:13:00
Message-ID: 936249.1750774380@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Is removing the debug_parallel_query=on configuration for HEAD a valid
> mode of operation for a buildfarm animal? I ran the tests 10 times in a
> row without issues today.

Sure, especially on slower machines. It's pretty much owner's
option whether to use that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2025-06-24 14:41:33 Re: pgsql: Introduce pg_shmem_allocations_numa view
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2025-06-24 13:32:07 Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin